Recent Comments by pipp3355 subscribe to this feed

Why Homosexuality Should Be Banned
yeah everyone knows that homosexuals are gay..


written by pipp3355  | 12 hours 7 minutes 45 seconds ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)

GI JOE PSA Remix - Mr. LaFitte (22 of 25)
*unfirst


written by pipp3355  | 2 days 21 hours 50 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

GI JOE PSA Remix - Buzz Lightyear (24 of 25)
*first


written by pipp3355  | 2 days 21 hours 52 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

Breakdancing Facial Expressions Lesson
NWA


written by pipp3355  | 2 days 22 hours 13 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

The Schwarzenegger Conspiracy: Deadliest Cover Up Ever
*first


written by pipp3355  | 2 days 22 hours 17 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

Reporting On Zorbing, She Did Not See This Coming...
*first


written by pipp3355  | 2 days 22 hours 18 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

Charles Manson's Epic Answer (24 sec)
i think what he's trying to say is:

There is an idea of a Patrick Bateman. Some kind of abstraction, but there is no real me, only an entity, something illusionary. And although I can hide my cold gaze, and you can shake my hand and feel flesh gripping yours and maybe you can even sense our lifestyles are probably comparable. I simply am not there.


written by pipp3355  | 2 days 22 hours 28 minutes ago | CH
 6  | flag spam (0)

Raccoon Wreaks Havoc on Kitchen
wallz do not want


written by pipp3355  | 3 days 12 hours 41 minutes ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)

Short footage of Choggie on his way back to Siftlandia
that's not choggie. its an actor in a film.


written by pipp3355  | 3 days 12 hours 48 minutes ago | CH
 5  | flag spam (0)

Monkey Using Frog as Sex Toy
beefjerky, anyone?


written by pipp3355  | 4 days 10 hours 37 minutes ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)

Mens 4x100 Relay - Olympic Swimming
i'm irish, whats the point in swimmin when u can just get a boat? and does the boat have alcohol? if not, don't bother gettin in the boat, cuz it'll be shite, and the weather's terrible anyway..


written by pipp3355  | 4 days 10 hours 56 minutes ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)

KABOOM! Toronto's Propane Depot Just Exploded
yeah so do i actually (vote to return). i don't think this is snuff.. but i also don't think the 9/11 'jumpers' video, or the fireworks explosion is snuff either, for the same reasons. i guess the easiest thing to do is submit the fireworks explosion again and see what happens, using this case (if it is returned) as a reference.

i vote to return


written by pipp3355  | 1 week ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

KABOOM! Toronto's Propane Depot Just Exploded
#

Please do not post pornography or "snuff" films (which we define as the explicit depiction of loss of human life displayed for entertainment).

Note: The presence of human fatality is acceptable and not considered "snuff" if presented as a limited portion of a lengthy educational, informative news report or documentary. Our definition of "snuff" does include but is not exclusive to any short clip in which a human fatality occurs whether or not any victims are actually visible on camera.


written by pipp3355  | 1 week ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)

KABOOM! Toronto's Propane Depot Just Exploded
*discuss

so far, it is known that at least one firefighter died in this blast and one employee is missing; probably dead.

discussion: what are the siftrules on snuff? what is snuff? and does this constitute snuff?

for a reference case, i once uploaded this video to the sift, which was subsequently dismissed because it was reported that the person filming died from the blast, even tho this report could not be verified, u can not know from watching the video that the person died, or even if the person died, that they died while the camera was still filming (and not later in a hospital, for example):

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=pJ5GWJjiNZg


written by pipp3355  | 1 week ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)

Judge Rips Law Student a New Poo-hole
nah, still not convinced. for example, if we got a transcript of this entire clip, and then deleted everything that wasn't rational argument, i think you'd end up with less than 5% of the entire transcript - the remaining 95% is just irrelevant noise (please prove me wrong on this!)

also, for the ad hominem doubters.. i'd argue that personal attacks are just a special case of red herring argument - information that may be correct, but that doesn't help us move any further towards a logical conclusion for the argument at hand..

so, for example, while it may be true that the judge's reaction to the arrogant young man is an indulgent display of immature emotionalism, and her behavior probably would have been different if there was no audience, this information offers us nothing in the way of determining whether or not a judge's behavior in a court room should be impartial and unemotional.


written by pipp3355  | 2 weeks 1 day ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)